Never before has the quest to balance the needs of people, the environment, and the economy been so important. While sustainability has. The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon. Capture and Storage. Paul E. Hardisty 1,2,*, Mayuran Sivapalan 3 and Peter. Available in the National Library of Australia collection. Author: Hardisty, Paul E; Format: Book; xxi, p.: ill. ; 25 cm.

Author: Zulkigrel Mezimi
Country: Chile
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 8 April 2008
Pages: 405
PDF File Size: 17.18 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.18 Mb
ISBN: 621-7-76703-849-2
Downloads: 70966
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shataur

In addition, there is also a range of potential external costs associated with deep geological disposal of CO 2. You can view this on the NLA website. Analysing the role of decision-making for industry in the climate change era. Action has been slow and insufficient because we do not want shstainability pay the price of action.

Environmental and Economic Sustainability – Paul E. Hardisty – Google Books

This is an important finding with respect to longer-term capital investment decisions. Dealing with climate change may come at a relatively high price. Costs to the global economy of inaction are permanent, irreversible, and catastrophic.

Catalogue Persistent Identifier https: Waste Treatment in the Process Industries.

Maximum injection is planned for 20 Mt, with 8 Mt injected to date. On this basis, governments in several developed nations such as the USA, Canada, Australia and some in Europe continue to fund a range of demonstration projects designed to prove the technology, develop operational experience, and spearhead the drive to cost-efficiency. Account Options Sign in. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

In some jurisdictions, there is the possibility that CCS will be required, by law, policy or regulation.

The NPV results are calculated for each value of each parameter, discretised across its full range, against every other possible combination of the other values, for each case. Costs and benefits of acting to mitigate climate change. The country you have selected will result in the following: N hbk Main Reading Room.

Environmental and Economic Sustainability | Taylor & Francis Group

Recent reviews have shown that the cost of CCS for CO 2 entrained in the raw reservoir gas is low compared to other applications. By varying key input parameters over a wide but reasonable range, the implications of a range of possible futures can be examined.


Such analysis reveals that all CCS is not created equal. Case 8 also achieves significant carbon reduction benefits, though the majority of the benefits for this case are from fuel cost savings from more efficient plant design; the combination of these benefits far exceeds the financial costs of achieving them.

Paul E Hardisty

The Economics of Climate Change: This is before the financial and social costs of sequestration are included. Compression power of 40 MW is provided at the plant.

In other industries, such as LNG, a number of other alternatives are available for carbon emission reduction. Globally, there are 62 active or planned commercial scale integrated CCS projects, comprising capture, transport and sequestration elements, sequestering over 1 Mtpa CO 2 [ 11 ].

Nevertheless, it is clear, from a macro-economic perspective, that the world is far better off with concerted action to achieve deep cuts in GHG emissions than it would be otherwise.

The student resources previously e.haristy via GarlandScience. Rohlfs W, Madlener R. Offline Computer — Download Bookshelf software to your desktop so you can view your eBooks with or without Internet access.

Since Aprilaround 0. We provide complimentary e-inspection copies of primary textbooks to instructors considering our books for course adoption. Garnaut [ 7 ]. It is also important to note that the highest uncertainty in cost was associated with the sequestration component.

Pascala S, Socolow R. That means that CCS must deliver consistent environmental and social benefits which exceed its costs of capital, energy and operation; it must be protective of the environment and human health over the long term; and it must be suitable for deployment on a significant scale.

Examples from the natural gas processing, liquefied natural gas LNGand coal-fired power generation sectors, illustrate that there is currently a wide range sustainabillity financial costs for CCS, depending on how and where it is applied, but equally, environmental and social benefits of emissions reduction can be considerable.

The Physical Science Basis. Management of produced water in the oil and gas industry in the Middle East Management of wastewater in a water utility in Australia Power generation and carbon management in an energy pzul in Australia Remediation of contaminated gas works in the UK Energy savings and carbon enironmental in heavy oil processing. Installation of the capture system has a significant effect on the performance of the plant. From a financial perspective, CCS costs need to come down significantly to make it viable in the near future for most applications, even as carbon prices are put in place around the world.


Aand and economic sustainability.

National Academy of Sciences. Figure 1 shows the annual CO 2 emissions of each case.

The Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Carbon Capture and Storage

Advanced search Search history. This is particularly useful when examining the sustainability of options. In the case of existing coal-fired power stations, CCS may be one of the only options available for substantially reducing GHG emissions.

Based on more than fifteen years of research and practice, Environmental and Economic Sustainability introduces the environmental and economic sustainability assessment EESAa new way to make decisions that meets the challenges of the 21st century.

To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video. Environmental and Economic Sustainability Paul E. Performance Installation of the capture system has a significant effect on the performance of the plant.

It is perhaps in the combination of all of these elements into a fully-integrated project that the main challenges for CCS arise.

CCS is an expensive proposition, no matter how it is applied, both in terms of up-front capital costs, and in terms of the significant amounts of energy required to capture CO 2. Base Condition Results The results of the base assessment are presented in Figure 2with net present values NPVs for each option compared to the reference case.