Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , E Diener and others published Beyond the hedonic treadmill. The Hedonic Treadmill (aka hedonic adaptation) is a theory that proposes that people return to their level of happiness, no matter what. According to the hedonic treadmill model, good and bad events temporarily affect happiness, but people quickly adapt back to hedonic neutrality. The theory.
|Published (Last):||26 January 2007|
|PDF File Size:||14.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The treadmiill treadmillalso known as hedonic adaptationis the observed tendency of humans to quickly return to a relatively stable level of happiness despite major positive or negative events or life changes. Augustinecited in Robert Burton ‘s Anatomy of Melancholy: The hedonic or happiness set point has gained interest throughout the field of positive psychology where it has been developed and revised further. Hedonic adaptation is a process or mechanism that reduces the affective impact of emotional events.
Generally, hedonic adaptation involves a happiness “set point”, whereby humans generally maintain a constant level of happiness throughout their lives, despite events that occur in their environment. Others conceptualize hedonic adaptation as functioning similarly to a thermostat a negative feedback system that works to hedonjc an individual’s happiness set point. One of the main concerns of positive psychology is determining how to maintain or raise one’s happiness set point, and further, what kind of practices lead to lasting happiness.
Hedonic adaptation can occur in a variety of ways. Generally, the process involves cognitive changes, such as shifting values, goals, attention and interpretation of a situation.
The “Hedonic Treadmill” is a term coined by Brickman and Campbell in their article “Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society”describing the tendency of people to keep a fairly stable baseline level of happiness despite external events and fluctuations in demographic circumstances.
In the case of hedonics, the sensitization or desensitization to circumstances or environment can redirect motivation. This reorientation functions to protect against complacency, but also to accept unchangeable circumstances, and redirect efforts towards more effective goals.
Frederick and Lowenstein classify three types of processes in hedonic adaptation: Shifting adaptation levels occurs when a person experiences a shift in what is perceived as a “neutral” stimulus, but maintains sensitivity to stimulus differences.
For example, if Sam gets a raise he thf initially be happier, and then habituate to the larger salary and return to his happiness set point. But heedonic will still be pleased when he gets a holiday bonus. Desensitization decreases sensitivity in hedobic, which reduces sensitivity to change.
Those who have lived in war zones for extended periods of time may become desensitized to the destruction that happens on a daily basis, and be less affected by the occurrence of serious injuries or losses that may once have been shocking and upsetting.
Sensitization is an increase of hedonic response from continuous exposure, such as the increased pleasure and selectivity of connoisseurs tradmill wine, or food. Brickman, Coates, and Janoff-Bulman were among the first to investigate the hedonic treadmill in their study, “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Lottery winners and paraplegics were compared to a control group and as predicted, comparison with past experiences and current communities and habituation to new circumstances affected levels of happiness such that after the initial impact of the extremely positive tbe negative events, happiness levels typically went back to the average levels.
Brickman and Campbell originally implied that everyone returns to the same neutral set point after a significantly emotional life event. They also concluded that individuals may have more than one happiness set point, such as a life satisfaction set tteadmill and tne subjective well being set point, and that because of this, one’s level of happiness is not just one given set point but can vary within a given range.
Diener and colleagues point to longitudinal and cross-sectional research to argue that happiness set point can change, and lastly that individuals vary in the rate and extent of adaptation they exhibit to change hednoic circumstance. In a longitudinal study conducted by Mancini, Bonnano, and Clark, people showed individual differences in how they responded to significant life events, such as marriage, divorce and widowhood.
They recognized that some individuals do experience substantial changes to their hedonic set point over time, though most others do not, and argue that happiness set point hedonkc be relatively stable throughout the course of an individual’s life, but the life satisfaction and subjective well being set points are more variable. Similarly, the longitudinal study conducted by Fujita thf Diener described the life satisfaction set point as a “soft baseline”.
This means that for most people, this baseline is hfdonic to their happiness baseline. Typically, life satisfaction will hover around a set point for the majority of their lives and not change dramatically. However, for about hedoinc quarter of the population this set point is not stable, and does indeed move in response to hreadmill major life event.
In his archival data analysis, Lucas found evidence that it is possible for someone’s subjective well-being set point to change drastically, such as in fhe case of individuals who acquire a severe, long term disability.
In general there is conflicting evidence on the validity of the hedonic treadmill, if people beyon return to a baseline level of happiness or if some events have hedomic ability to change this baseline for good. While some researchers believe life events change people’s baseline for good over the course of one’s life, others believe people will always return to their baseline.
In recent large panel studies divorce, death of a spouse, unemployment, disability and similar events have been shown to change the long-term subjective well-being, even though some adaptation does occur and inborn factors affect this. In the aforementioned Brickman studyresearchers interviewed 22 lottery winners and 29 paraplegics to determine their change in happiness levels due to their given event winning lottery or becoming paralyzed.
The event in the case of lottery winners had taken place between one month and one and a half years before the study, and in the case of paraplegics between a month and a year. The group of lottery winners reported being similarly happy before and after the event, and expected to have a similar level of happiness in a couple of years.
These findings show that having a large monetary gain had no effect on their baseline level of happiness, for both present and expected happiness in the future.
Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being.
They found that the paraplegics reported having a higher level of happiness in the past than the rest due to a nostalgia effecta lower level of happiness at the time of the study than the rest although still above the middle point of the scale, that is, they reported being more happy than unhappy and, surprisingly, they also expected to have similar levels of happiness than the rest in a couple of years.
One must note that the paraplegics did have an initial decrease in life happiness, but the key to their findings is that they expected to heonic return to beyonf baseline in time. In a newer studywinning a medium-sized lottery prize had a lasting mental wellbeing effect of 1. Some research suggests that hedonic setpoints can potentially be raised with new compounds like NSI Other research suggests that resilience to suffering is partly due to a decreased fear response in the amygdala and increased levels of BDNF in the brain.
New genetic research have found that changing a gene could increase intelligence and resilience to depressing and traumatizing events. Recent research reveals certain types of brain training can increase brain size. The hippocampus volume can affect mood, hedonic setpoints, some forms of memory.
A smaller hippocampus has been linked to depression and dysthymia. London taxi drivers’ hippocampi grow on the job, and the drivers have a better memory than those who didn’t become taxi drivers. Lucas, Clark, Georgellis, and Diener researched changes in baseline level of well-being due to marital status, birth of first child, and layoff.
While they found that a negative life event can have a greater impact on a person’s psychological state and happiness set point than a positive event, they concluded that people completely adapt, finally returning to their baseline level of well-being, after divorce, losing a spouse, the birth of a child, and for women losing their job.
They did not find a return to baseline for marriage or for layoffs in men. This study also illustrated that the amount of adaptation depends on the individual. Wildeman, Turney, and Schnittker studied the effects of imprisonment on one’s baseline level of well-being. They researched how being in jail affects one’s level of happiness both short term while in prison and long term after being released.
They found that being in prison has negative effects on one’s baseline well-being; in other words one’s baseline of happiness is lower in prison than when not in prison.
Once people were released from prison, they were able to bounce back to their previous level of happiness. Silver researched the effects of a traumatic accident on one’s baseline level of happiness.
Silver found that accident victims were able to return to a happiness set point after a period of time. For eight weeks, Silver followed accident victims who had sustained severe spinal cord injuries. About a week after their accident, Silver observed that the victims were experiencing much stronger negative emotions than positive ones. By the eighth and final week, the victims’ positive emotions outweighed their negative ones. The results of this study suggest that regardless of whether the life event is significantly negative or positive, people will almost always return to their happiness baseline.
Fujita and Diener studied the stability of one’s level of subjective well-being over time and found that for most people, there is a relatively small range in which their level of satisfaction varies.
They asked a panel of 3, German residents to rate their current and overall satisfaction with life on a scale ofonce a year for seventeen years. They also found that those with a higher mean level of life satisfaction had more stable levels of life satisfaction than those with lower levels of satisfaction.
Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being.
The concept of the happiness set point proposed by Sonja Lyubomirsky  can be applied in clinical psychology to help patients return to their hedonic treaemill point when negative events happen. Determining when someone is mentally distant from their happiness set point and what events trigger those changes can be extremely helpful in treating conditions such as depression.
When a change occurs, clinical psychologists work with patients to recover teadmill the depressive spell and return to their hedonic set point more quickly. Because acts of kindness often promote long-term well-being, one treatment method is to provide patients with different altruistic activities that can help a person raise his or her hedonic set point. Hedonic adaptation is also relevant te resilience research. Resilience is a “class of phenomena characterized by patterns of positive treamill in the context of significant adversity or risk,” meaning that resilience is largely the ability for one to remain at their hedonic greadmill while going through negative experiences.
Psychologists have identified various factors that contribute to a person being resilient, such as positive attachment relationships see Attachment Theorypositive self-perceptions, self-regulatory skills see Emotional self-regulationties to prosocial organizations see prosocial behaviorand a positive outlook on life. One critical point made regarding our individual set point is to understand it tje simply be a genetic tendency and not a completely determined criterion for happiness, and it can still be influenced.
Their findings suggest that drug usage and addiction lead to neurochemical adaptations whereby a person needs more of that substance to feel the same levels of pleasure. Thus, drug abuse can have lasting impacts on one’s hedonic set point, both in terms of overall happiness and beyonx regard to pleasure felt from drug usage.
Genetic roots of the beoynd set point are also disputed. Sosis has argued the “hedonic treadmill” interpretation of twin studies depends on dubious assumptions. Pairs of identical twins raised apart aren’t necessarily raised in substantially tfeadmill environments.
The similarities between twins such as intelligence or beauty may invoke similar reactions from the environment. Thus, we might see a notable similarity in happiness levels between twins even though there aren’t happiness genes governing affect levels.
Further, hedonic adaptation may be a more common phenomenon when dealing with positive events as opposed to negative ones. Negativity biaswhere people tend to focus more on negative emotions than positive emotions, can be an obstacle in raising one’s happiness set point. Negative heyond often require more attention and are generally remembered better, overshadowing any positive experiences that may even outnumber negative experiences.
Headey concluded that an internal locus of control and having “positive” personality traits notably low neuroticism are the two most significant factors affecting one’s subjective well-being. Headey also found that adopting “non-zero sum” goals, those which enrich one’s relationships with others and with society as a whole i.
Conversely, attaching importance to zero-sum life goals career success, wealth, and social status will have a small but nevertheless statistically significant negative impact on people’s overall subjective well-being even though the size of a household’s disposable income does have a small, positive impact on subjective well-being. Duration of one’s education seems to have no direct bearing on life satisfaction. And, contradicting set point theory, Headey found no return to homeostasis after sustaining a disability or developing a chronic illness.
These disabling events are permanent, and thus according to cognitive model of depressionmay contribute to depressive thoughts and increase neuroticism another factor found by Headey to diminish subjective well-being. Disability appears to be the single most important factor affecting human subjective well-being. The impact of disability on subjective well-being is almost twice as large as that of the second strongest factor affecting life satisfaction—the personality trait of neuroticism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. January Learn how and when to remove this template message. Paradox of hedonism Hedonic treadmill. The New York Times.
Retrieved August 16,