Seta-Shell Four Ball Autoload Lubricant Tester for ASTM D, ASTM D, IP We perform grease testing by ASTM D to measure the load-carrying properties or load wear index of lubricating grease using a four ball test apparatus. This standard is issued under the fixed designation D ; the number 1 This method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on Petroleum.

Author: Kale Zulkishura
Country: Vietnam
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 1 January 2010
Pages: 22
PDF File Size: 4.94 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.17 Mb
ISBN: 559-6-40155-298-7
Downloads: 14194
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrigami

Contemplating a switch of grease products, due to poor performance or process change, brings to light the critical issue of compatibility. Before implementing a new product, plant and maintenance engineers must weigh all consequences of grease intermixing and the impact on equipment reliability, production levels and the asmt line.

Innovative data and testing tools aid the decision process through the analysis of two or more co-mingled greases. A critical part of this assessment is working with a lubricant supplier with the specific industry know-how, and the proper testing procedures in place to ensure maximum grease compatibility and performance, promoting business success and profitability.

Understanding compatibility and contamination is the first step to optimal grease performance, plant awtm and return on investment. Simply, compatibility results when the performance properties of the mixed greases are equal or better than the lower performing grease. In some cases, performance properties of the mixed greases may be less than the lower performing grease, yet still meet customer specifications and requirements.

Incompatibility can be identified from the performance or measured physical properties of two or more mixed greases. An incompatibility issue could be reflected in reduced lubricating performance due to the modified composition of the fluids and additives from intermixing.

Maximizing Grease Performance Through Optimal Compatibility

astmm Changes in physical properties would be reflected by a softening or hardening of grease consistency, or decreased shear stability upon mechanical working and even reduction in thermal stability identified by a reduction in dropping point. Maintenance and engineering personnel can minimize the risk associated with grease changes by doing each of the following:.

The final determination of compatibility comes with proper testing of greases in 2d596 application for key performance properties. More often than not, intermixed grease analysis shows minimal changes in grease performance, but this cannot be taken as the rule without proper assessment. Because percent grease replacement is unlikely, axtm level of contamination is certain to occur, requiring the pre-implementation measurement of leftover grease with a new product before finalizing an upgrade or machinery process change.


Taking this precautionary measure assures reliability and performance of equipment. In addition, because equipment users usually do not have the proper resources to perform testing themselves, it is d25966 responsibility of the grease supplier to measure grease compatibility with dropping point, penetration and high-temperature performance test machines.

Optimally, supplier testing will show low levels of contamination where performance is not affected, making the transition to a new grease product quick and easy. However, a true incompatibility situation may result e2596 low-performing grease affects the performance of the higher performing grease, meaning another grease with more satm intermixing attributes should be considered. Current technology pinpoints assessment of dropping point, consistency after shearing conditions, and change after storage at extremely high temperatures as measurements providing the most information with the least resource expenditure.

These tests can be conducted concurrently or sequentially with varying ratios for example, An overview of a recently performed aviation grease study by Anderol demonstrates the necessity of proper grease testing within the actual manufacturing environment. In this example, a recent three-test trial of intermixed lithium soap-thickened greases reveals details of compatibility when observing grease consistency, antiwear and extreme pressure along with water contamination on extreme pressure grease performance.

For study purposes, two greases sample No. Click Here to see Tables 1 and 2. For this experiment, asmt low-level, 10 percent by weight, of d296 was implemented to avoid d2569 degradation of the individual greases and to simulate a situation common to typical grease changeouts.

It was found that all three greases showed good mechanical shear stability, antiwear performance and extreme pressure characteristics consistent with the specifications to which each individual grease was designed. Simply put, all the grease samples were found to be compatible with one another. Even though the study found no grease incompatibility issues, changes in grease performance were measured and documented.

In particular, the results of the load-carrying capability or four-ball extreme pressure testing illustrated the aspect of performance dilution upon contamination. Table 2 presents a selection of data points showing how low-level contamination by water and a lesser performing grease resulted in a reduction in performance of a higher performing product. A graphic representation showing the dramatic difference in load-carrying capability between two grease samples sample No.

The lithium complex grease, sample No. The performance dilution continues when the lithium complex grease is contaminated by both the lithium OH stearate grease and water. The dilution in performance is again nearly d25966 to the level of contamination, that is a 20 percent reduction xstm the load wear index upon 20 percent contamination. Figure 2 shows how d2956 performance of a grease can be reduced by contamination from water or a lesser performing grease.


If incompatibility occurs, failure would be found in any of the tests of a given specification requiring no other testing; however, a borderline compatible reading requires additional application testing for conformance to the extreme temperatures and excessive pressure conditions of a given grease application.

Generally, greases having similar thickener types will be compatible, but even greases of the same thickener systems can be d2569 incompatible because of differing additive treatments and must be judged on an individual basis. Regardless of the manufacturing industry – be it food processing, mining, aatm generation or aviation – plant managers and engineers need to work hand-in-hand with a supplier employing highly trained professionals with expertise in industrial lubricants and applications to ensure compatibility.

Ideally, a supplier with an intensive research and development program is willing to perform tests before a lubrication change is implemented to protect machinery from failure or wear. In addition, where possible the supplier should be present throughout a grease changeout to make sure the new grease runs correctly. The supplier should also spend time qstm maintenance personnel ashm make sure they know what to look for going forward. With these elements in place, companies will enjoy improved operating efficiency, increased machine life and an overall cost effectiveness.

Tribological Testing by 4 Ball Methods

Toggle navigation Toggle search. Current Issue Archive Advertise. Understanding Compatibility Understanding compatibility and contamination is the first step to optimal grease performance, plant operations and return on investment. Maintenance sstm engineering personnel can minimize the risk associated with grease changes by doing each of the following: Select greases with similar thickening systems.

Select greases designed for the environment in which the equipment is operating. Relubricate frequently, taking care not to overlubricate, especially motors.

It is best to both increase the frequency and reduce the volume.

Testing Overview More often than not, intermixed grease analysis shows minimal ast in grease performance, but this cannot be taken asfm the rule without proper assessment. A Testing Example An overview of a recently performed aviation grease study by Anderol demonstrates the necessity of proper grease testing within the actual manufacturing environment. About the Author John Kurosky. Advantages of Using Polyurea Grease. Grease Sampling Methods Matter. The Best Gets Better: Maintenance Services and Products.

Create your own user feedback survey.