Documents Similar To Dr. Donáth Tibor – Anatómia atlasz. Werner Platzer SH atlasz Anatómia II. kötet. Uploaded by Fitness Company – Edzéselmélet jegyzet . Funkcionális anatómia: főiskolai jegyzet gyógytornász hallgatók számára. Front Cover. Semmelweis Egyetem Egészségügyi Főiskolai Kar, – pages. Testnevelés anatómia, élettan és egészségtan: egységes jegyzet: tanárképző főiskolák. Front Cover. Barton József. Tankönyvkiadó, – pages.
|Published (Last):||20 April 2015|
|PDF File Size:||14.45 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. In the interwar period, there was a certain proximity between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Anglican Church, materialized at that time through bilateral visits at the highest level, such as that of Patriarch Miron Cristea inIn the interwar period, there was a certain proximity between the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Anglican Church, materialized at that time through bilateral visits at the highest level, such as that of Patriarch Miron Cristea inand discussions jegyzrt theological themes that emphasized the elements of doctrine and worship similar for the two churches.
However, the fracture produced by the Second World War, then the establishment of a regime of Soviet inspiration in Romania, have tempered, almost canceled these links. Moreover, in the years of consolidation of the new regime, its antioccidental phobia and gross interference in the affairs of various denominations and ecclesiastical institutions contributed further to jeyyzet alienation of the two Churches.
All these drawbacks had to be recovered through a mutual effort, which happened after jeyyzet especially at the middle of the decade, taking full advantage of a certain conjuncture of Romania’s political relations with the West and a certain course of his foreign policy intentions.
As such, the mutual visits of theologians have resumed, the doctrinal discussions on remote scenarios of union have become constant, the activity of the Romanian Orthodox parish in London has intensified, and the presence of the Archbishop of Canterbury in Bucharest inand of the Patriarch Justinian in London inmarked an apogee of this evolution. We should state right jeyyzet the beginning that this portrait is not very flattering for the head of the Romanian Orthodox Church.
All the news, reports and information about Patriarch Justinian create the image of a hierarch responsible All the news, reports and information about Patriarch Justinian create the image of a hierarch responsible for the abdication of the Church in front of the Communists.
For Radio Free Europe his Patriarchat, especially in the 50s, is painted all in red being the one who accepted the entire policy of the regime in regard to the Church, that is the Marxist propaganda in the monasteries, reducing the number of monks and nuns, closing monasteries, forcing the retirement of some unwanted bishops, using the Church and the clergy for the peace rhetoric of the Communist regime, among the Romanian believers but especially abroad.
Also, the past and present ties of Patriarch Justinian with the anaatmia leaders of the Romanian Workers’ Party, even with Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, were blurry, unclear and inappropriate being an extra reason to catalog him as a friend of the Communists.
On the other hand, for this portrait Radio Free Europe has used partial information, obtained from Romanian refugees, persons claiming to know the Patriarch or lower-rank officials and rarely official documents. As strange as it may seem, the dark years of fatal assault of proletculture in the creations of spirit and of terror in Romanian society, the 50s offered a cultural product that we can still frequent today without repulsion. Romania, but not only, was a land of jokes, and anecdotes, and they functioned as valves for those who wanted to escape the tyranny of history.
Anaymia arrived and broadcast by Radio Free Europe, these jokes have drawn different contours for Romanian realities, they proposed to the West an alternative image, absolutely opposed to the one that official propaganda was trying to spread. Some more subtle, some of the most striking, the jokes described a country of endless deprivations, in which repression and political terror were the only concerns of some detested party leaders, a country irredeemably subjugated to the Soviets.
There are also those who, with a fine irony, treat the stupidity of the militiamen, the cadre policy of the regime and even the Romanians’ hopes of removing the Communists. The unification of the Romanian people in is the most important event in the history of Romania. The Union of Bessarabia on April 9, of Bukovina on November 28 and of Transylvania with all the eastern Hungarian districts inhabited by The Union of Bessarabia on April 9, of Bukovina negyzet November 28 and of Transylvania with all the eastern Hungarian districts inhabited by the Romanians on December 1, are the result of a sustained effort by the Romanian intellectual elite, which assumed the role of building and fulfilling the ideal of unification of all Romanians in one state.
The press is an essential source for the study of the history of the Great Union, because it reflects the views of the Romanian society about the national ideal.
Newspapers, magazines and other periodicals have been the main driver of public opinion. The media was the main source of information at the time, and it is because of this reason that the intellectual elites, who assumed the role of opinion vectors, concentrated their efforts and creativity to promote the national ideal of Unification to all Romanians through opinion articles, news and poetry with a strong patriotic message: Historians that have studied the Great Union have focused in particular on the use of official documents, diaries and memoirs, and more rarely on the press, usually reduced to just a few newspapers.
The subjectivism of memoirs and diaries is indisputable, especially in the case of those politicians who were more interested in their image and on how they will be remembered by posterity.
And official documents, whether they are programmatic documents or political or administrative decisions, are just the result of preliminary activities, which they rarely jegyzwt, and even then, in vague terms. The press has the advantage of being able to capture the thoughts and emotions that were the foundation for society’s national sentiment.
The opinion articles, reports, or news, often commented upon, had the role of shaping public opinion. The role of the press in the realization of the Great Union should not be reduced to a single journalist, newspaper, or a few articles. The press should be viewed as a whole, because every article that was debating the national cause reached a certain number of readers. Step by step, through a more or less conscious press campaign, sometimes even by conjuncture or political opportunism, this idea anztmia a Greater Romania was supported, explained and assumed.
For a historian who wants to understand how the ideal of the Union of all Romanians was built and realized inthe press is an indispensable historical source. Many of the articles were not always penned by professional journalists. Many of them were intellectuals with various occupations who in those historic moments decided to dedicate themselves to the national cause and write anqtmia a way that anatmix convincingly mobilize politicians and sway public opinion towards the fulfillment jehyzet the national ideal of unification of all Romanians.
The present collection, “Romanian Newspapers naatmia the Union of Bessarabia, Bukovina and Transylvania”, proposes to the interested public an edition of articles that were selected from all the publications that were accessible to the research team, which made reference to the Great Union.
Anafmia collection will contain several volumes of articles from the years Promoting the ideal of the Union of Bessarabia, Transylvania and Bukovina: Petersburg and expressed hope for the awakening of the Moldavians from the state in which they were brought by the Tsarist regime: The volume closes on December 15, December 2, according to the old calendar that is, the day when the Council of the Country took the decision to proclaim the Moldavian Democratic Republic, a jetyzet that materialized in a few days, on December 19 December 6 on old style.
The press’s reaction to this official act, which is particularly important in the process of separating Bessarabia from Russia and then for anaatmia Union with Romania, will be published in the next volume. So, the chronological limit to this volume is an invitation to see the continuation in the next one.
The paradox of a society without qualities. The Romanian society is hard to understand, even for a social sciences researcher. If you consider the country’s position in terms of all kinds of If you consider the anatmka position in terms of all kinds xnatmia resources natural, human, strategicyou can envy the country you see.
It is a member of the European community and, for the first time in history, it is part of an international coalition that can provide a sense of security in an area which has always been tense and uncertain.
Macroeconomic figures show a top European growth, and a foreign anatmiaa could easily discern major changes since the s. Our society seems to have this particular type of impersonality, an alienation from itself, a lack of participation in its own destinity. We have a potential that we do not bring into presence, we are not able to bring it to surface.
Everything is possible, can happen, and can be thought, but the society does not mobilize anamia for this virtuality to become a fact. So we can talk about an absent Romania, a probable Romania.
You have the feeling that Romanians watch their life as if it were a stageplay that they themselves find bad. The indentity of the individual can be fabricated virtually, and the presence of the other can be put in standby. The requirement is the connection to the society, not the contact itself or the relationship itself. David Le Breton calls this white noise blancheura state of absence of the self, a saturation, and a fullness of the search for identity in relation to others and the social body.
It retains the blanc space in the sense of the unused memory of a CDa sort of a white psychosisa fall caused by the feeling that things cannot be changed and nobody can really influence one’s own destiny. The state of indifference dominates jeggyzet life because one has the feeling that this world is slipping through one’s fingers. There is a will to live a neutral anahmia without relying on social recognition.
To live a sort of destiny in the shadows. In fact, a part of the population can even jfgyzet to invisibility, but this condition is met anyway jegtzet a result of the indifference that grows more and more as a state of withdrawal and social non report. Sometimes, entire groups of subjects that we study sociologically refrain from speeking freely on important manners; annatmia happens not because they don’t understand the matter or they are afraid of something, but because they simply admit they haven’t thought of that problem before, even if it was an important matter of society.
A large part jehyzet the society becomes even more absent an absent Romania and, most often, we see this at the very young ones, to age segment. Democratic individualism More and more, we live in what sociologists call a new type of individualismwhich is maybe an accomplishment of the late Enlightenment, a true release from the human prejudices and beliefs about emancipation from forms of established authority and a winning, in fact, of a real personal autonomy.
The difference from the traditional individualism would anatmua that a new dimension, a social eluding, an isolation from peers, and a true desire for detachment are added to the dimension of emancipation. Since the ’90s, Gilles Lipovetsky has noticed a political and civic detachment as anatmoa as strong forms of narcissism, and Cornelius Castoriadis has highlighted the processes of representation and self-representation crisis that jeguzet identity disorders, especially a cultural relativism that rewrites identification processes by the loosening of ethnocentrisms and the idealization of foreign cultures.
The new individualism is highlighted by the more important place that is offered to personal and especially public life emotions. Television and cinema in particular, but also other forms of media, create emotional crowds, which are bound by emotion and, notably, an equality of the emotional fusion in themes or topics.
Sentimental crowds are organized around themes or TV stations and thus become political and even commercial driven areas with the help of these new types of emotional, rather than rational, signals, which link the man with the world, and this way deny many societal mediations. While travelling once on a highway from New York to Long Island, I jwgyzet the physical feeling of singularness.
It was a five or six-lane highway; all the lanes were packed, and we were speeding, just a few cars, on the middle lane. The other cars were running in jeyyzet, at half speed, yet nobody was honking, nobody was angry. The middle lane was destined to two-passengers cars to encourage people to group. When I looked at the rows of cars driving on the other lanes, which we were passing by, I was stunned. In each of those many cars, there was just one single person, the one at the wheel. Very few were tempted to use the special line; most of the drivers who were running on the other lanes jegyze traveling alone.
I suddenly saw the society of singular people. My feeling was that I was contemplating Romania in a distant mirror. The transition from the jeggyzet of individual consciousness to the philosophy of intersubjectivity. In individualism and singularized societies, every individual’s interest is king, and people turn their rights into the core of the social jfgyzet political life, hoping that their actual life will become an important social topos.
Singularness is a result of the individualization process. Individualization is considered a fundamental jegyzeh of our world, where the individual becomes independent and is jegyze to try to solve by himself or herself all the challenges and risks of life.
Jegyzt starts from the idea that contemporary society has several features, besides the democracy which Tocqueville called responsible for the emergence of individualism, and these features produce this change that we could call post-individualistic: Other recent works in sociology show that singularness is not a withdrawal from the world, an extramundane asceticism as Max Weber would say, but on the contrary, it starts from a recognition of what is common: They want the world to change according to their singularness; they don’t adapt to the world, but expect iegyzet world to adapt to them.
In other words, the individual wants to make his or her interests the core of the social life. As a consequence, that social life has valued more the difference and individuality; and D. Martuccelli calls this the sick exacerbation of the desire to be, that is, a kind of compulsive exhibitionism.
The same phenomenon is to be found pretty clearly in the works of the American scholar Christopher Laschin the form of a culture of narcissism as a stage of the development of capitalism where a “paternalism without pater” or rather a solipsism is born, where nothing matters to the individual but his anztmia her own world ready to dive into like a lake of “pseudo-authenticity”.
Funkcionális anatómia: főiskolai jegyzet gyógytornász hallgatók számára – Google Books
One of the most important issues is that contemporary singularness rejects or hides the desire for equality of people, once so strongly normed in society, especially as inequalities grow year by year. Neither social justice nor equality of chance generate even ideal rules; individuals aren’t focused anymore on what brings them closer but on things that are obstacles to assertiveness.
From political perspective emerge an obvious contradiction, and also a major malfunction, both evidenced in the last century, at least as an ideal or as political programs. The idea of equality of chance is in the center of politicians speeches or government policies, but anatmiz the same time, politics does not oppose inequalities. From sociological perspective, singularness suggests an ever more present aspiration and exigency: All these sociological researches may explain some of the Romanian society’s characteristics.
We live in a clogged society, a society that hardly grows, and where too little progresses add up for a leap to modernity to jebyzet place. Singularness or the ways of standing apart generate social indifference and self-suspension from public action space.
This volume seeks to explore the underground spaces of this clogged society, to analyze critically and to look for the sources and the resources for a possible Romania, a Romania that will be truly alive.