Actas de los martires on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Actas de los Mártires has 2 ratings and 0 reviews: Published by Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, pages, Hardcover. Contardo Miglioranza is the author of Acta de los mártires ( avg rating, 3 ratings, 0 reviews), Maximiliano Kolbe ( avg rating, 3 ratings, 0 revi.
|Published (Last):||5 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||15.71 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.50 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. To this must be relegated all those Acts, Passions, Lives, Legends, and Translations which have been written with the express purpose of perverting history, such, for instance, as the legends and translations ed attaching a saint’s name to some special church or city.
In summary, he has outlined and perfected the discipline of the method. The most valuable contribution, however, is due to the bolandist H.
Actas de los Mártires by Daniel Ruiz Bueno
December Click [show] for important translation instructions. With much greater seriousness, although very slowly, they are occupied with these works according to an organic plan by the Bollandists.
Articles to be expanded from December All articles to be expanded Culture articles needing translation from Spanish Wikipedia Articles incorporating text from the Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference. It has been observed in the first place that a classification of the texts based on the criterion of the authenticity of the martyr or the legitimacy of his cult is not valid or useful. The introductory formula of the consular date of the records preserve the indication of the emperorgovernor or proconsul, even in historically erroneous cases.
Delehaye, from whose writings it would be possible to extract a critical summula. Maintaining the same criteria as Delehaye, the texts can be classified into three simpler groups:. The Benedictine, who had a rather vague idea of the purpose of its collection, only intended to make known the oldest and most trustworthy document for each of the martyrs, with the intention of excluding falsified documents.
Anyhow, the shortage of this type of documentation can be explained in part by the destruction ordered by Diocletian in the year of the sacred books that existed in the churches and that would have affected the records equally. Neither does the classification meet the demands of criticism  two large groups, contemporary documents and subsequent documents, since it does not express anything about the value of the document.
Such a distinction is also justified by the different purpose and nature of both type of documents; the records are destitute of all hagiographic character, while the Passions are characterized by their purpose and edifying religious sense. Learn more about Amazon Prime.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion.
Actas de los Mártires
Except for the records, all of the narrative documents mentioned above offer, from a literary point of view, common characters, since they are all the result of an elaboration and compositional process typical of hagiographic literature; the tendency to the schematic form has a remote origin, whose trace already manifested in ancient texts, close to the type and narrative sincerity, of the same record.
A third category is accounts that are largely or purely legendary, probably with or without a kernel of historical information. View a machine-translated version of the Spanish article. acts
You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. The expression Acta martyrumin general applies to all narrative texts about the death of the martyrs; but it possesses a more precise and restricted meaning, when referring, in technical terms, to the official records of the processes and conviction. Harnackin Germany; P. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? In Edmond-Frederic Le Blant had the idea to continue and complete the compilation of Ruinart and added another group of records, which he considered authentic by the adequacy of the narrative with the Roman legal phrases. In recent years, a series of principles and norms of hagiographic criticism have been exposed in relation to the records by several specialists, such as, H.
The first attempt to determine the authentic records is owed to the Benedictine Thierry Ruinartwho collected and published texts that he considered genuine. Leclercq, in France ; the Jesuit F.
For more guidance, see Wikipedia: This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: I’d like to read this book on Kindle Don’t have a Kindle? This page was last edited on 1 Septemberat Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
Still, as they were written with the intention of edifying and not deceiving the reader, a special class must be reserved for hagiographical forgeries.
There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
Nonetheless, it is necessary to add that in the group of records is included some texts containing narrative parts alien to the verbal process, but of equal historical and documentary value Acta-Passio SS.
No precedents have been preserved that allow us to know if the Church of Romewhich had organized a section of notaries, took the initiative of collecting the records of its martyrs, nor is the news that Julius Africanus did a similar task as far as Rome is concerned, trustworthy. Showing of 1 reviews. This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: There are no vestiges matrires the churches got involved in after restoring the heritage of the destroyed hagiographic texts.